{"id":"W2515615030","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.07.010","title":"Project management self-efficacy as a predictor of project performance: Constructing and validating a domain-specific scale","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Project Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Comparability; Project management triangle; Project management; Scale (ratio); OPM3; Domain (mathematical analysis); Program management; Set (abstract data type); Project planning; Software project management; Measure (data warehouse); Project manager; Engineering management; Knowledge management; Process management; Computer science; Engineering; Systems engineering; Software; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00422265,0.0003165356,0.0003273427,0.001205883,0.0006156329,0.0008341371,0.0004485875,0.0006054086,0.001163507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01347011,0.0002787938,0.0006345735,0.0006462146,0.0008337954,0.0005961839,0.0009709306,0.0009759886,0.0002722239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004242639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008765566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001015423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001975744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983557,0.000749082,0.0001697884,0.0001157536,0.0004821072,0.0001274816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831662,0.01000163,0.002818558,0.0009883351,0.001701964,0.001323181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002226266,0.002105636,0.975444,0.0000495854,0.000132259,0.00006133284,0.001978767,0.001110532,0.001145207,0.0004478775,0.0004050659,0.01689719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004019982,0.0008318198,0.9927403,0.00003297875,0.00004520995,0.00005547125,0.001297559,0.003456792,0.0006978075,0.0002866142,0.0005000876,0.00001516579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982209,0.00001342814,0.0004488377,0.00002526279,0.000004391903,0.0001043259,0.00005701282,0.00000672028,0.001119228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977101,0.00003074445,0.001544796,0.00001390569,0.00000428077,0.0002652212,0.0001599525,0.00000363868,0.0002673368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00422265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02233177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05127633460751074,"score_gpt":0.3559900418015657,"score_spread":0.3047137071940549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}