{"id":"W2515891506","doi":"10.1109/sp.2016.43","title":"Talos: Neutralizing Vulnerabilities with Security Workarounds for Rapid Response","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Security and Verification in Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workaround; Computer science; Vulnerability (computing); Computer security; Exploit; Code (set theory); Software; Secure coding; Operating system; Software security assurance; Information security; Security service; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00400995,0.002188699,0.00070588,0.001637037,0.0006590824,0.001579083,0.003145475,0.001484243,0.003610216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01680137,0.001159964,0.001076411,0.0004543022,0.002826051,0.004186283,0.003773563,0.002042772,0.001943207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007099241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001424442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001542491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001012969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946694,0.001357354,0.0004297797,0.0009665931,0.001660066,0.0009168318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859655,0.003997711,0.003322868,0.004463683,0.001364787,0.0008854026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003409913,0.001676501,0.0554441,0.002161195,0.0006630858,0.002084532,0.004043901,0.05637237,0.5078365,0.0128902,0.0284495,0.3249682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001212177,0.008818681,0.03481508,0.0006317697,0.0009677204,0.003378156,0.002547168,0.3243954,0.5329666,0.01800334,0.07132903,0.0009350472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"software","genre_scores_codex":[0.4842996,0.001618831,0.3503729,0.001113853,0.0005595384,0.001082315,0.0003698068,0.153669,0.006914114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8876216,0.0003622343,0.1035189,0.0009223102,0.00008000864,0.0003928905,0.0004893041,0.004001833,0.002610945],"genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00400995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02120686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03620936681950668,"score_gpt":0.2853534543307426,"score_spread":0.2491440875112359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}