{"id":"W2515900725","doi":"10.1007/s12686-016-0597-9","title":"Characterization, optimization, and validation of environmental DNA (eDNA) markers to detect an endangered aquatic mammal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics Resources","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Tongji University; State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Biology; Environmental DNA; Endangered species; Porpoise; Primer (cosmetics); Critically endangered; Zoology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Fishery; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001660322,0.0001534979,0.0001347986,0.00006644201,0.0001658233,0.00002490237,0.0001727119,0.0000632115,0.0006554161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004939813,0.0001364492,0.00002424695,0.0001300664,0.0002541876,0.0002186778,0.0002293098,0.0000261323,0.00007081345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001151003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002434617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002454056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001614503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987857,0.0001003436,0.0002719265,0.0003460379,0.000326876,0.0001691181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941,0.0000583485,0.0001689743,0.0002372224,0.000005960175,0.0001194618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002885734,0.00002317186,0.5446097,0.000003950061,0.00001147204,3.695416e-7,0.000713448,0.0005802814,0.4474095,6.540029e-7,0.00006808741,0.006550535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003338832,0.0001741689,0.8726009,0.00001371243,0.00002537796,0.000001798186,0.0002209449,0.0007816728,0.1232068,0.00001897727,0.00244029,0.0001815078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896576,0.00002343081,0.009106988,0.000645387,0.00003851662,0.0003388567,0.0001028594,0.00002418028,0.00006217576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827719,0.0001933305,0.01636506,0.000275314,0.00001749511,0.00001633681,0.00004948213,0.00001603407,0.0002950615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3279911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7176347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01199523127890245,"score_gpt":0.193794043195407,"score_spread":0.1817988119165045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}