{"id":"W2516240404","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.08.003","title":"Bayesian fusion algorithm for improved oscillometric blood pressure estimation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Engineering & Physics","topic":"Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation","keywords":"Algorithm; Computation; Standard deviation; Fuse (electrical); Bayesian probability; Blood pressure; Mean squared error; Computer science; Fusion; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Medicine; Engineering; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003540979,0.001139982,0.001628597,0.001930904,0.0005979161,0.001001118,0.001379194,0.001268462,0.001696971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008560451,0.0006598026,0.001185888,0.001756597,0.0004503074,0.001670975,0.001600684,0.001498592,0.001010143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005845301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001185476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004338244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002916449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978969,0.0004839563,0.0002058472,0.0004022452,0.0008671956,0.0001439012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998154,0.000714075,0.0002232527,0.0001281892,0.0007276867,0.00005278338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006191453,0.0001655954,0.002201881,0.0002383365,0.000258694,0.0001143625,0.0002659123,0.1977153,0.02488494,0.01016783,0.003804034,0.759564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002405042,0.00006468212,0.001491888,0.00002741876,0.00005320672,0.00008807992,0.0000183259,0.9875309,0.004638521,0.004201575,0.001826814,0.00003453907],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004829439,0.0002917443,0.9939449,0.00006356667,0.00002869695,0.00002266105,0.00004246962,0.0003586385,0.0004179007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2397504,0.0007207203,0.7563054,0.0001878031,0.0001751717,0.000230651,0.0006473826,0.0001563913,0.001826156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004338244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01872671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005527462380126245,"score_gpt":0.2426030249023351,"score_spread":0.2370755625222088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}