{"id":"W2516296618","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.006","title":"A simple method for analyzing matched designs with double controls: McNemar's test can be extended","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"McNemar's test; Logistic regression; Computer science; Matching (statistics); Statistics; Simple (philosophy); Null hypothesis; Score test; Data mining; Statistical hypothesis testing; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1556522,0.003084906,0.007728558,0.009863012,0.001768939,0.002876012,0.008348693,0.003959007,0.02637195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4306915,0.001933039,0.008118628,0.01019115,0.003339179,0.004359436,0.004194489,0.006299121,0.002531405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001254804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004673067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003897569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003154513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8297513,0.1328271,0.01229641,0.01100806,0.0129595,0.001157661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6483191,0.286296,0.01018814,0.04682879,0.007457514,0.0009103572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002998729,0.0007778743,0.01042664,0.005776091,0.01247794,0.001338736,0.001182376,0.01251139,0.004131563,0.1381837,0.01524677,0.7949482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00460126,0.007105967,0.02624493,0.002780081,0.008416121,0.005966899,0.001018543,0.154581,0.01056536,0.6913413,0.08628725,0.001091375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001937707,0.0007628028,0.9943434,0.0002836908,0.0004001563,0.000928679,0.0004123994,0.0004252611,0.0005058739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03380949,0.0007805618,0.9577057,0.0004571651,0.0003418605,0.004830627,0.0004725366,0.0003188412,0.001283093],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1556522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8231774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5988744036316583,"score_gpt":0.6051541069230387,"score_spread":0.00627970329138039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}