{"id":"W2516946846","doi":"10.1177/0093854816667974","title":"Appraising Risk for Intimate Partner Violence in a Police Context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Domestic violence; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Predictive validity; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Injury prevention; Risk assessment; Occupational safety and health; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Medical emergency; Medicine; Computer security; Geography; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001325312,0.0002469902,0.0003121,0.001882157,0.0006712346,0.000985448,0.0003532819,0.0002942841,0.000605983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01348679,0.000256509,0.0002447302,0.0008636461,0.0005121244,0.0006286372,0.0007982026,0.0005224551,0.0001538775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004145449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005354701,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01753758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02969767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988858,0.0004582577,0.00008498414,0.00006280786,0.0003924907,0.0001156676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962705,0.001135424,0.001585987,0.0002170889,0.0005795523,0.0002113222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000186485,0.00002202658,0.995244,0.000005490236,0.00001538678,0.00006330886,0.0007361908,0.00003895754,0.00007269633,0.00001434988,0.0000371145,0.003731819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002015089,0.0001184151,0.9955333,0.00001556538,0.00001515691,0.0003698928,0.00303078,0.0005065802,0.000108469,0.00005776267,0.0002358415,0.000006131614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992633,0.00008853157,0.00008067498,0.00003959185,0.000003571748,0.00001069077,0.00002894158,0.000001854464,0.0004827473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995463,0.0001650214,0.0001402585,0.000009065865,0.000007587611,0.000004489838,0.00004490577,6.977257e-7,0.00008153469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01753758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03487104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06212616810059667,"score_gpt":0.3825296087361691,"score_spread":0.3204034406355724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}