{"id":"W2517028597","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12099","title":"Chamberlin Meets Ciriacy‐Wantrup: Using Insights from Experimental Economics to Inform Stated Preference Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Revealed preference; Public good; Economics; Mechanism (biology); Public economics; Data science; Positive economics; Management science; Microeconomics; Environmental economics; Computer science; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07052313,0.0009738337,0.001950197,0.002021719,0.001955535,0.007435971,0.00188057,0.004846479,0.014074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2602798,0.0007975465,0.0008574598,0.003203509,0.008154247,0.01152102,0.002569459,0.005216428,0.001302299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003629123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004570181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003873186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003866392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9314554,0.05943689,0.001366649,0.00269676,0.004571227,0.0004730886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5612985,0.3923464,0.01476468,0.02172343,0.008093511,0.00177358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001064847,0.0004795172,0.006950288,0.0009461945,0.0002883736,0.0001968509,0.003151898,0.004564909,0.001203199,0.8580595,0.01118083,0.1119138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003424122,0.0003105616,0.002790359,0.0005083694,0.0001013256,0.00008845994,0.001044945,0.01098579,0.00118377,0.9540032,0.02855727,0.00008354484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.176136,0.02025593,0.4099209,0.2317004,0.00189481,0.001322833,0.001737579,0.0003771922,0.1566544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8358525,0.009030559,0.1289781,0.01547114,0.0007895422,0.002269978,0.0004254052,0.0001067868,0.007076051],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3729664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2454691916418485,"score_gpt":0.2276372192078999,"score_spread":0.01783197243394866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}