{"id":"W2517652362","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2015-0125","title":"Agent-based simulation of multiple-round timber combinatorial auction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Géomatique du Québec; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Combinatorial auction; Common value auction; Computer science; Multiunit auction; Profit (economics); Set (abstract data type); Generalized second-price auction; Auction theory; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006253643,0.00006599254,0.0001651831,0.000960297,0.0003159107,0.00009651298,0.0005514087,0.00008436758,0.001033333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008003593,0.00004194036,0.0001165382,0.000879485,0.0004739405,0.0003471417,0.00001499614,0.0002073617,0.0001813751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002275562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001443064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007377182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009104801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972751,0.0004933495,0.0006186281,0.0001541903,0.001179325,0.0002794517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929324,0.003493285,0.0003277997,0.0003368045,0.00239933,0.0005103381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008533103,0.0002435325,0.5541695,0.00001761625,0.0000862551,0.00007054005,0.0007907422,0.2160637,0.003711836,0.1175786,0.03061412,0.07580019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003861048,0.0007654626,0.207369,0.0001618605,0.00001952412,0.0000405715,0.0007480275,0.01076207,0.005381394,0.5362678,0.234369,0.0002542803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9416689,0.00003621496,0.05477371,0.001755692,0.0007155801,0.0001577558,0.00002670316,0.000003049134,0.0008623493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998476,0.000001526467,0.0001255211,0.00001360604,0.0003046969,0.000003439983,0.000001059295,0.000007721543,0.001066455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4186891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2229014247278587,"score_gpt":0.4536480507075664,"score_spread":0.2307466259797076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}