{"id":"W2518352767","doi":"10.1080/14926150509556644","title":"Students' perceptions and learning experiences of tertiary‐level chemistry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tertiary institution; Tertiary level; Higher education; Institution; Mathematics education; Chemistry education; Chemistry; Psychology; Perception; Quality (philosophy); Style (visual arts); Medical education; Set (abstract data type); Academic institution; Pedagogy; Medicine; Library science; Sociology; Physics; Social science; Computer science; Geography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00294858,0.0003631379,0.0004842717,0.001293399,0.002218197,0.004099174,0.0006503323,0.0009442996,0.004633389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0138642,0.0003546753,0.0007255739,0.0006496781,0.001380344,0.001256164,0.002483694,0.001948315,0.0007323861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001911286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002365729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01270275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02169805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972529,0.0005503659,0.0002127912,0.0002004275,0.0009762848,0.000807233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843461,0.003682075,0.002837668,0.0002943418,0.00281413,0.006025711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001515917,0.006556993,0.7247152,0.0002491406,0.0001263666,0.0008241445,0.2119996,0.000374553,0.007184703,0.0009130463,0.001907583,0.04363274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007992789,0.002675475,0.7282267,0.0001000173,0.00007624648,0.0003499588,0.2598558,0.0004613375,0.003389486,0.0003484192,0.004340222,0.00009647122],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998776,0.00003224409,0.00002131491,0.00006473122,0.000005673942,0.000008370314,0.00001447026,0.000002116839,0.001074891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988538,0.00004469826,0.0000281924,0.00003984347,0.000003193802,0.000007641837,0.00002042625,0.000001532076,0.001000688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01270275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02525765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04198518053604387,"score_gpt":0.3950263574275873,"score_spread":0.3530411768915435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}