{"id":"W25186947","doi":"10.1177/1074840714548943","title":"Brief of Amici Curiae Economics Professors in Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System (U.S. Supreme Court)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Nursing","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"National Institute of Nursing Research; National Center for Research Resources; U.S. Public Health Service","keywords":"Scrutiny; Commission; Supreme court; Exploit; Market power; Power (physics); Power of attorney; Empirical research; Health care; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Public administration; Law; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001982851,0.0005585603,0.0005318444,0.0008102935,0.01433768,0.00319064,0.00133484,0.013723,0.02617229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007736802,0.0005988737,0.000456663,0.0005817093,0.001307017,0.00289823,0.002067724,0.01664427,0.00338843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004948577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008789572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04891074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984804,0.0004741193,0.00007522361,0.0002443049,0.0003130729,0.0004129289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973304,0.001537744,0.0001108767,0.00007029773,0.0003621723,0.0005884841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001334939,0.00003814576,0.0005583119,0.00005520934,0.000003925062,0.001339397,0.00154851,0.00002296445,0.0001651735,0.004536986,0.9820371,0.009681077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111415,0.00003507385,0.003774707,0.0002087875,0.00001043936,0.0006796498,0.004598305,0.00007726516,0.0001873701,0.001437133,0.988957,0.00002318046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.007251269,0.01865567,0.000343424,0.8526071,0.03219306,0.0001452088,0.0003536493,0.00007854036,0.08837195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05831152,0.0147092,0.0003204027,0.6227798,0.01442792,0.000189904,0.0002037077,0.00008563563,0.288972],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04891074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09725207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05804216342623267,"score_gpt":0.3417583900252651,"score_spread":0.2837162265990325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}