{"id":"W2519049132","doi":"10.1108/jbs-08-2015-0084","title":"Getting to clarity: new ways to think about strategy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Strategy","topic":"Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Variety (cybernetics); Strategic thinking; Bureaucracy; Originality; Strategic planning; Strategic management; Perspective (graphical); Business; Process management; Public relations; Management science; Knowledge management; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005441852,0.0003361391,0.0004403082,0.0007744782,0.0001923736,0.0009249223,0.0006639064,0.0001229513,0.0007564303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003954082,0.0002354563,0.0001141067,0.001618261,0.00004042349,0.003100251,0.0001791809,0.0001962815,0.0006952339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007648546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002764096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003739018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001282944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976515,0.00001206787,0.0007950549,0.0003233241,0.0006815115,0.0005365047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977266,0.00006722079,0.0005808427,0.0002661989,0.001244003,0.0001151563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005239488,0.0003483283,0.005755901,0.0006000731,0.0003251029,0.0003644746,0.0004053563,0.01341689,0.03221787,0.62734,0.212648,0.106054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005492314,0.0004268239,0.5078618,0.002318354,0.0005812235,0.0001338869,0.007037135,0.0001517679,0.001224895,0.1606697,0.3114498,0.002652375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4003575,0.0006208543,0.3767782,0.1365398,0.004368549,0.001357017,0.00001566996,0.0004841468,0.07947823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861542,0.00003120669,0.001286365,0.00550011,0.005623545,0.000002524273,0.000004815726,0.00006404411,0.001333186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5857967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9601628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04552994982472071,"score_gpt":0.2469824275778756,"score_spread":0.2014524777531549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}