{"id":"W2519297144","doi":"10.1109/tcst.2016.2604739","title":"Optimal Hybrid Magnetic Attitude Control: Disturbance Accommodation and Impulse Timing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology","topic":"Spacecraft Dynamics and Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Impulse (physics); Optimal control; Attitude control; Mathematics; Limiting; Quadratic equation; Torque; Linear-quadratic regulator; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Control (management); Control engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000361091,0.0003586725,0.0003377865,0.0001887282,0.0001543862,0.0004612549,0.0004836109,0.0003634958,0.0006085917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006068795,0.0001452639,0.000200007,0.0002070505,0.0003848883,0.0003010575,0.0004767614,0.0003156297,0.00009632316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000210372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000268812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007666745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007434548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998055,0.00004301569,0.00001205397,0.0000394933,0.00006745179,0.00003246697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997788,0.0000678029,0.00007157931,0.00002478452,0.00003941737,0.00001757472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004153134,0.00008960188,0.0005160982,0.0001661574,0.00004359673,0.0001278857,0.000113563,0.8122231,0.05395004,0.01707324,0.0006255127,0.1146558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002195386,0.0001346753,0.0001702676,0.000003810679,0.000006488207,0.00001916799,0.000006668136,0.9948063,0.002979627,0.001358382,0.0004864135,0.000006161169],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04686745,0.0001406347,0.949679,0.00005946453,0.000065507,0.00002157023,0.00000874219,0.0001921603,0.002965589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723316,0.00005056458,0.02633064,0.00002363027,0.00002958376,0.00002841029,0.0000110223,0.00001246363,0.001182058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0007666745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002035975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004226670499120171,"score_gpt":0.1882635693606547,"score_spread":0.1840368988615345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}