{"id":"W2519481048","doi":"10.1002/ieam.1846","title":"Assessing the relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory decision making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre; Queen's University","funders":"European Food Safety Authority; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Relevance (law); Risk analysis (engineering); Representativeness heuristic; Risk assessment; Hazard; Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Ecology; Business; Engineering; Political science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006064479,0.0002768455,0.0003150192,0.00005282107,0.0003893896,0.00003045718,0.0003098606,0.0001270213,0.0009869057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000316285,0.0001493892,0.0001013371,0.0001089806,0.001269156,0.0003578497,0.0006725524,0.0001216721,0.00003576824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006318209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004127271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001047447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001466913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981437,0.0001247468,0.0004795344,0.0005668488,0.000292996,0.0003922185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985744,0.0007734675,0.0002422422,0.0003462018,0.000002613846,0.0000610981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002273163,0.000783367,0.1276321,0.00007408311,0.0004594968,0.00002925711,0.0001848901,0.0003916813,0.1892016,0.004039007,0.008408085,0.6685691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002328575,0.0009085634,0.925015,0.0003150541,0.0002365426,0.00002801557,0.003280825,0.0005778461,0.01028496,0.01902385,0.03738426,0.0006164509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835595,0.0002640838,0.01114463,0.0006421858,0.0002742165,0.001096389,0.00001831749,0.00003446552,0.002966245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782575,0.002024184,0.01781701,0.0004656524,0.00002214006,0.0003542021,0.000004622302,0.00002163971,0.00103303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.797383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02766923018679894,"score_gpt":0.3368195027838551,"score_spread":0.3091502725970562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}