{"id":"W2519481048","doi":"10.1002/ieam.1846","title":"Assessing the relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory decision making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre; Queen's University","funders":"European Food Safety Authority; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Relevance (law); Risk analysis (engineering); Representativeness heuristic; Risk assessment; Hazard; Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Ecology; Business; Engineering; Political science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4760072,0.002328727,0.004295854,0.01768846,0.002857826,0.01778695,0.007383634,0.01388339,0.005407823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5631418,0.001421195,0.005205754,0.006718466,0.009034344,0.009936737,0.01022166,0.01135378,0.001829581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007523288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02622073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002497704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003146639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4702129,0.3533908,0.05624303,0.007888121,0.1098928,0.002372329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2081071,0.610117,0.05195299,0.02931728,0.09724828,0.003257272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002409778,0.001055217,0.02960765,0.08127083,0.005668844,0.002571944,0.006871774,0.01419094,0.01223901,0.1585874,0.06717098,0.6183557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000775871,0.003153334,0.02800653,0.11713,0.006463296,0.00187051,0.00480776,0.01139222,0.01512241,0.274323,0.536094,0.0008612239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04641475,0.3395247,0.2970546,0.1540134,0.01810589,0.01614433,0.003391992,0.0008272256,0.1245231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4536532,0.1096757,0.3645266,0.04287045,0.01188529,0.01061637,0.001962272,0.00040472,0.004405494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5239928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6461765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02766923018679894,"score_gpt":0.3368195027838551,"score_spread":0.3091502725970562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}