{"id":"W2519688379","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.014","title":"Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Edmonton, Canada: Source apportionment and potential risk for human health","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Environmental science; Environmental health; Health risk assessment; Particulates; Interquartile range; Apportionment; Aerosol; Public health; Sulfate; Biomass burning; Hazardous waste; Health risk; Environmental chemistry; Toxicology; Environmental engineering; Medicine; Chemistry; Geography; Waste management; Meteorology; Biology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004708494,0.0001477693,0.0001625184,0.0000227029,0.0003139962,0.000009009738,0.00006614772,0.00005547838,0.001092428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009349998,0.0001185779,0.00003038519,0.00003477549,0.0001641456,0.0001676275,0.00008900305,0.00007678922,0.00009921761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001511301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002759598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1368135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2535135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983996,0.0001108129,0.0003875992,0.0003355993,0.0002710235,0.0004954119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993647,0.00001853466,0.0001930191,0.0001633691,4.519725e-7,0.0002599657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001667631,0.0003859403,0.8368677,0.00004780481,0.0000214139,0.000005844704,0.0008438635,0.004074149,0.01611033,0.0000641095,0.03577999,0.105632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009946144,0.0001371173,0.9868345,0.00001879737,0.000007463062,0.000005470843,0.00008139414,0.0002213089,0.0004854064,0.0004130391,0.01064019,0.0001607541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760395,0.00005882292,0.008038746,0.01509457,0.00006094405,0.0005296629,0.0001253644,0.00001198559,0.00004041773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965841,0.00004919925,0.0002319584,0.002122931,0.0000419939,0.00004154423,0.00002280309,0.0000151513,0.0008903429],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1499667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0111222564364266,"score_gpt":0.2384804957414607,"score_spread":0.2273582393050341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}