{"id":"W2519895786","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.015","title":"Assessing sustainable remediation frameworks using sustainability principles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Mitacs; Saskatchewan Research Council; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Sustainability; Operationalization; Environmental remediation; Sustainable development; Equity (law); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Management science; Engineering; Environmental science; Political science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008765325,0.0002422137,0.0002694653,0.00009560339,0.0002525854,0.0001004064,0.0003618222,0.0001540648,0.002056224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006107642,0.0001721371,0.0001752305,0.0001544482,0.000328006,0.002099989,0.0006363713,0.0002604343,0.00006207113],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004471606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001595667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001994253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001410299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974476,0.0001462058,0.0006639386,0.0002888388,0.0009065431,0.0005468903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987764,0.00007047352,0.0006295777,0.0002910598,0.000007872456,0.0002246587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001940952,0.00202175,0.7906842,0.0001114948,0.0003184391,0.0007304755,0.000875623,0.004636424,0.05421632,0.001441142,0.000806368,0.1439637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001640691,0.0002681382,0.962122,0.00009733799,0.0001735981,0.00004526537,0.008951446,0.0001312376,0.002183156,0.0100806,0.0138315,0.0004750445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800862,0.00005373128,0.01457623,0.0005362364,0.0002167973,0.0003724919,0.000002681001,0.00001361612,0.004142004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910656,0.0001776514,0.005648989,0.0001708423,0.0001207684,0.000006098993,0.000001168277,0.0000288927,0.002780047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1714378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01458876590275916,"score_gpt":0.286485097435318,"score_spread":0.2718963315325589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}