{"id":"W2520045687","doi":"10.1108/jaoc-02-2014-0013","title":"Integrative contingency-based framework of MCS: the case of post-secondary education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Originality; Contingency theory; Accountability; Accounting; Framing (construction); Exploratory research; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Business; Political science; Qualitative research; Computer science; Epistemology; Social science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001036654,0.0002270372,0.0003579635,0.0005695164,0.0002121702,0.0001144979,0.0005124997,0.0001075278,0.001025117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003324966,0.0001342737,0.0001370706,0.001254927,0.0001513901,0.001507339,0.0001583011,0.0002139218,0.00003205278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007261473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003947502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002380147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005609463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980969,0.00003364354,0.0009521364,0.0001892774,0.0005265858,0.0002014965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909503,0.0004868688,0.002587732,0.0002364787,0.005721386,0.00001716016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005372101,0.001797668,0.4772802,0.002011535,0.0007444899,0.0001074244,0.002733166,0.000100626,0.01643238,0.4222463,0.01993751,0.05607153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00820237,0.0007051351,0.6754209,0.01198156,0.002920777,0.001020554,0.03101327,0.001535434,0.02577954,0.1599798,0.07823794,0.003202787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658253,0.0008719212,0.01513634,0.01374539,0.001984357,0.0005274921,0.00004591834,0.00005191052,0.001811401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918017,0.00002454461,0.001754327,0.003166008,0.003094762,0.000005582586,0.00001881006,0.00005265737,0.00008155433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2622665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01125699778852064,"score_gpt":0.2350005889335026,"score_spread":0.2237435911449819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}