{"id":"W2520075891","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1320","title":"Hart and Mack: New Restraints on Mr. Big and a New Approach to Unreliable Prosecution Evidence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Law; Federal Rules of Evidence; Political science; Admissible evidence; Digital evidence; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security; History; Digital forensics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03585006,0.0009517106,0.00116889,0.003650644,0.009048575,0.01716837,0.005422513,0.02401179,0.002636545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06492119,0.00142071,0.001382331,0.002664065,0.04935101,0.01477639,0.004361989,0.03190425,0.0006637761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02338122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03954637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3516897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5881118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9498205,0.01382802,0.003426486,0.004537493,0.02526928,0.003118185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9236091,0.04689252,0.003522565,0.004677156,0.0178186,0.003480085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005914965,0.00003329146,0.001294638,0.0003804867,0.00005502827,0.001273492,0.006463881,0.0002958204,0.001220778,0.7506069,0.2013611,0.0369555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001405752,0.00009158935,0.006543926,0.002216367,0.0001789655,0.001174759,0.004435187,0.001044102,0.001288163,0.2410019,0.7414445,0.0004399165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.009080959,0.03236691,0.01170273,0.8749126,0.00673439,0.000157576,0.000148192,0.00009953238,0.0647972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2486529,0.02323789,0.0334818,0.6327667,0.01529297,0.0002875707,0.0001035823,0.0001560812,0.04602059],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3516897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6992853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2886321541641624,"score_gpt":0.3911996219176977,"score_spread":0.1025674677535353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}