{"id":"W2520175157","doi":"10.1038/ajg.2016.417","title":"Efficacy of Secondary Prophylaxis With Vancomycin for Preventing Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infections","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","topic":"Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Hazard ratio; Clostridium difficile; Antibiotics; Internal medicine; Vancomycin; Retrospective cohort study; Proportional hazards model; Confidence interval; Cohort study; Cohort; Surgery; Gastroenterology; Staphylococcus aureus; Microbiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006030091,0.0001946559,0.0008067025,0.0002672793,0.00008994403,0.000008427674,0.0002661126,0.00003440019,0.00007230517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003514475,0.00009456976,0.0003293839,0.0002840475,0.0007284172,0.00005960704,0.00007530255,0.0004130111,0.000003257295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001214918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002978395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001402492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001943782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998031,0.0002318212,0.0007062049,0.0002017515,0.0003482462,0.0004809574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972822,0.000644328,0.001008991,0.0003561765,0.0005329621,0.000175346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.2184511,0.004425334,0.09455853,0.0003296192,0.002339726,0.0001006977,0.0005514961,0.00006384445,0.3503667,0.00006381657,0.003567762,0.3251813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0377657,0.5590056,0.1049931,0.001774136,0.001395947,0.00677596,0.001329312,0.00005109411,0.2792446,0.0001325141,0.007110805,0.0004211484],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926552,0.0001067613,0.002929226,0.003524733,0.0001610444,0.0005162828,0.00003685976,0.0000117049,0.00005818094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984637,0.0001395638,0.0007873816,0.00009276431,0.000368666,0.00002154325,0.000002594827,0.00003095412,0.00009286177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5545803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3856443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01421975394964287,"score_gpt":0.2863688265258431,"score_spread":0.2721490725762002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}