{"id":"W2520175157","doi":"10.1038/ajg.2016.417","title":"Efficacy of Secondary Prophylaxis With Vancomycin for Preventing Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infections","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","topic":"Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Hazard ratio; Clostridium difficile; Antibiotics; Internal medicine; Vancomycin; Retrospective cohort study; Proportional hazards model; Confidence interval; Cohort study; Cohort; Surgery; Gastroenterology; Staphylococcus aureus; Microbiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007901814,0.0003153852,0.0008791952,0.0003713481,0.0002118914,0.000541526,0.000492195,0.000309887,0.001291491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004729148,0.00009507405,0.001006468,0.0002191117,0.0001644299,0.0001610148,0.0002343223,0.0007201734,0.00009562687],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007848111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001510984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007221042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01435039,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991983,0.0003004971,0.00008146247,0.0001004098,0.0001844215,0.0001350447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975317,0.0005763125,0.0009176331,0.00009656105,0.0003225477,0.0005552832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04542443,0.006103735,0.4037177,0.002567328,0.004446447,0.0004186243,0.0001824663,0.001886822,0.007272619,0.000250022,0.003766961,0.5239629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004601739,0.05332736,0.9237268,0.001075516,0.0027165,0.00152191,0.0001532384,0.004943931,0.003748035,0.0001537711,0.003998255,0.00003283024],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753127,0.02198641,0.000425126,0.000442952,0.0001263637,0.00009926006,0.0001916111,0.00004399357,0.001371476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996878,0.002350978,0.0002782089,0.0001009168,0.00007024107,0.00001770961,0.000153721,0.000003043632,0.0001471415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007221042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01435804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01421975394964287,"score_gpt":0.2863688265258431,"score_spread":0.2721490725762002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}