{"id":"W2520512529","doi":"10.3168/jds.2016-11000","title":"Chemical and ruminal in vitro evaluation of Canadian canola meals produced over 4 years","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Dairy Science","topic":"Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canola Council of Canada; University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"Canola; Rumen; Casein; Chemistry; Absorbance; Protein degradation; Animal science; Soybean meal; In vitro; Meal; Digestion (alchemy); Composition (language); Solubility; Food science; Ammonia; Chromatography; Biochemistry; Biology; Fermentation; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005542131,0.0008309053,0.0004690845,0.0006610013,0.0009225185,0.0007778936,0.0004922661,0.0003621976,0.000765293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005566913,0.0003604082,0.0004204728,0.0008023003,0.0003904034,0.0001974578,0.0003436926,0.0005075103,0.0002869345],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004452724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002027729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3320096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5683569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995543,0.00004012114,0.00001942476,0.0001398062,0.0001557897,0.00009051282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992699,0.0001061176,0.0001122158,0.00003570029,0.0003114418,0.0001647271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001308847,0.00009113662,0.007086548,0.0001706582,0.00006058728,0.0001474926,0.0002181848,0.0002423493,0.9866444,0.00004935685,0.0001314688,0.003848948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003305287,0.002407977,0.4479159,0.00003274069,0.0003360822,0.0003378429,0.0006687529,0.001535382,0.5385492,0.00004562571,0.008050001,0.00008744717],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915628,0.002139503,0.0008232115,0.00004184757,0.00002304838,0.00008069208,0.002473833,0.00002067508,0.002834339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725552,0.001999303,0.006763279,0.0002050704,0.00003253863,0.0001296022,0.007346995,0.00005666645,0.0109112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6679904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6601541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03706880999374571,"score_gpt":0.2685911838436347,"score_spread":0.231522373849889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}