{"id":"W2520970558","doi":"10.1080/13549839.2016.1229762","title":"Communicating risk for vulnerable groups: a case study of the Mano community’s strategies for collective knowledge to action","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Local Environment","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Disaster risk reduction; Risk communication; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Risk management; Work (physics); Sustainability; Community resilience; Collective action; Business; Risk assessment; Public relations; Risk analysis (engineering); Knowledge management; Environmental planning; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Engineering; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006363806,0.0008757422,0.0005421322,0.001853492,0.03785018,0.004099018,0.002656428,0.006065986,0.0048484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01140473,0.0004640398,0.0007261519,0.001336862,0.00956386,0.004088817,0.011558,0.004622196,0.0005304946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004084738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005945844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01851241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04522344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993508,0.004733389,0.00008239831,0.0002453348,0.0003555002,0.001075358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946833,0.002773689,0.0004692722,0.000322815,0.0003492284,0.001401637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007059739,0.0005579499,0.004877465,0.0001127857,0.00001674411,0.01919019,0.9440474,0.0002442156,0.0006451305,0.01157195,0.003261392,0.01540412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001782253,0.0001730906,0.001862182,0.0001111503,0.00001329444,0.002474921,0.9573625,0.0004415227,0.0002880435,0.00308475,0.03414619,0.00002450563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9423243,0.0004130826,0.003067538,0.01498214,0.0001702054,0.0003848857,0.00003896522,0.00003432437,0.0385845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859064,0.0005670139,0.003368749,0.001413456,0.00006057799,0.0002798591,0.00002260758,0.00003039701,0.008351039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03785018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03680927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06380856044423826,"score_gpt":0.3398621090354482,"score_spread":0.27605354859121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}