{"id":"W2521036045","doi":"10.1017/jfm.2016.491","title":"Non-Darcy effects in fracture flows of a yield stress fluid","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Fluid Mechanics","topic":"Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Darcy's law; Mechanics; Pressure gradient; Fracture (geology); Flow (mathematics); Darcy–Weisbach equation; Yield (engineering); Computation; Limiting; Nonlinear system; Stokes flow; Geology; Porous medium; Geotechnical engineering; Computer science; Physics; Thermodynamics; Porosity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005073889,0.0005456406,0.000484055,0.000692613,0.0006400805,0.001029395,0.0005643191,0.0007258561,0.0006626646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003050127,0.0002844298,0.0004540828,0.000266278,0.001660741,0.000830874,0.0007277629,0.0007355543,0.00009043652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000475892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004946457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003742013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002319307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999841,0.00004525486,0.000008760389,0.00002425217,0.0000427741,0.00003803199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991253,0.0004618013,0.0001824232,0.00006659608,0.00009216229,0.00007161942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002110434,0.0002187028,0.009207281,0.0001272121,0.00005788122,0.0009377872,0.0006609887,0.8580625,0.05924287,0.05744635,0.0004012631,0.0134261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001469095,0.00007401878,0.001336623,0.000006720722,0.000006728155,0.00009579208,0.00005335152,0.9884625,0.00508843,0.004596598,0.0002483054,0.00001622888],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9008963,0.0003392526,0.09420757,0.0003477622,0.00004432385,0.00006218871,0.00004159062,0.0001217978,0.003939284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861208,0.0001514365,0.01213481,0.00004777658,0.00002333909,0.00002962012,0.00001890059,0.00003414806,0.001439081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003742013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007440448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005735565537513235,"score_gpt":0.2140184307413629,"score_spread":0.2082828652038497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}