{"id":"W2521099350","doi":"10.1007/s11219-016-9340-8","title":"An empirical study on the effects of code visibility on program testability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Quality Journal","topic":"Software Testing and Debugging Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities","keywords":"Testability; Visibility; Computer science; Code coverage; Artifact (error); Code (set theory); Software; Software quality; Software engineering; Software metric; Programming language; Software development; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Set (abstract data type)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00835709,0.0003346635,0.0003068191,0.001443981,0.0004737717,0.001103409,0.0007606927,0.0007189278,0.00320872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1825936,0.0003420287,0.000632658,0.001362044,0.001344097,0.002047631,0.001126557,0.001564572,0.0002037049],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005622097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001037802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002606209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003387453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906233,0.005390198,0.0006887293,0.0007281698,0.002097844,0.0004717157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2573614,0.6832477,0.03790956,0.009921348,0.007607208,0.003952626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002568791,0.00443064,0.9499137,0.0002319047,0.0002516609,0.0002803825,0.002761788,0.0009941929,0.003405941,0.0008441043,0.0002755878,0.03404127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008778366,0.003308944,0.9896656,0.00004336519,0.0001996013,0.0003152174,0.00108828,0.002553403,0.001867062,0.0003961188,0.0004552491,0.00001941173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983044,0.0001349581,0.000509271,0.00004944538,0.000003105406,0.00001519457,0.00004551435,0.00001024221,0.0009278771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999316,0.00004257713,0.0004193472,0.00001082027,0.000004226374,0.000008163457,0.00004550693,0.000007327508,0.0001462024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04419708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06644119961895152,"score_gpt":0.4136435348790582,"score_spread":0.3472023352601067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}