{"id":"W2521171147","doi":"10.1002/em.22045","title":"Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Genetic testing; Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Hazard; Hazard analysis; Adverse Outcome Pathway; Computational biology; Computer science; Biology; Bioinformatics; Medicine; Genetics; Engineering; Computer security; Reliability engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007442217,0.001847078,0.001193768,0.002976886,0.001283093,0.005380601,0.005692661,0.005586777,0.005688118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006345972,0.0007946471,0.001601101,0.001607679,0.005091111,0.006053375,0.003644357,0.003935424,0.001701027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003929361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005218579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006867735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004466685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960189,0.001590648,0.0002265136,0.0006341946,0.00132547,0.0002042856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962686,0.001822965,0.0003087875,0.0002887451,0.001082782,0.0002280305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001992068,0.0000611975,0.0009741314,0.0002523582,0.00003326209,0.0006344127,0.0002657132,0.02131747,0.001108089,0.938441,0.00304237,0.03385006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002607886,0.000231824,0.000476566,0.0005939309,0.0000742824,0.001297884,0.0004229028,0.1135656,0.001544165,0.7842144,0.09744542,0.0001069243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003155051,0.01039784,0.9195921,0.01717232,0.0004806942,0.0004764099,0.0002643999,0.0002935675,0.04816755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2028005,0.0256521,0.7333304,0.00739742,0.00128549,0.002212457,0.0005824361,0.0001733826,0.02656573],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007442217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03935868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1573329686274239,"score_gpt":0.3290041565746377,"score_spread":0.1716711879472138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}