{"id":"W2521360622","doi":"10.11646/zootaxa.4169.3.2","title":"A systematic revision of the genus Gnophopsodos Wehrli, 1945, with description of two new species (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zootaxa","topic":"Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Biology; Lepidoptera genitalia; Zoology; Taxon; Taxonomy (biology); DNA barcoding; Key (lock); Male genitalia; Genus; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003082702,0.0006325991,0.0003685478,0.001903678,0.001031832,0.0007608199,0.0006607302,0.0004873842,0.003653932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004810661,0.0001322915,0.0002948183,0.001135589,0.001190176,0.001139464,0.001266757,0.0007358122,0.001018629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009378198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001724022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004852133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008765032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997301,0.00003428149,0.00003727614,0.00008214727,0.00008195267,0.00003422759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997469,0.0000276995,0.00007635207,0.00003344812,0.00007419899,0.00004136023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001629274,0.0000571326,0.0394548,0.001463565,0.00007230011,0.001494561,0.003335455,0.0004131881,0.01866805,0.009332617,0.01946114,0.9060843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001568028,0.0001987469,0.0852804,0.0009770693,0.0001161119,0.004745809,0.001460277,0.0002966459,0.001347953,0.002114622,0.9034102,0.00003660104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5395877,0.1998749,0.04072321,0.006859224,0.01122751,0.001151325,0.005493157,0.00160532,0.1934776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8102083,0.07334325,0.06382093,0.003916868,0.002235728,0.0004626434,0.005653565,0.0001849188,0.04017381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004852133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01222366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01609481719753312,"score_gpt":0.2199094813587909,"score_spread":0.2038146641612578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}