{"id":"W2521522969","doi":"10.7202/1069159ar","title":"MARTTI KOSKENNIEMI, FROM APOLOGY TO UTOPIA: THE STRUCTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT (REISSUE WITH NEW EPILOGUE) (CAMBRIDGE: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2005) – UNITING PRAGMATISM AND THEORY IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP: KOSKENNIEMI’S FROM APOLOGY TO UTOPIA REVISITED","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Utopia; Pragmatism; Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; International law; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004245,0.001358731,0.0009581649,0.003874348,0.007535331,0.008858865,0.003364807,0.01111922,0.00647474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009587522,0.0007156518,0.0005747349,0.00429241,0.02602533,0.03536284,0.00403971,0.01139756,0.00123009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01017942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008781474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04987461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970767,0.001253553,0.0001509608,0.0003168796,0.0008559811,0.0003458507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961067,0.002551836,0.0003976574,0.0001679863,0.0005122206,0.0002635241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003106516,0.00003043376,0.0003630173,0.0002483327,0.00001449439,0.0002116563,0.01403141,0.00008754201,0.0001202499,0.649393,0.3181055,0.01736331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003569186,0.00001644755,0.002343271,0.0008713634,0.00001410622,0.0002886986,0.008507807,0.0002092253,0.0002451903,0.5093595,0.4780508,0.00005784466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002995094,0.4632523,0.003482686,0.468857,0.005634681,0.00003612281,0.0001557105,0.00003828878,0.05554818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2851721,0.4146412,0.01168922,0.1873385,0.02406911,0.0004063144,0.0003575514,0.0002946222,0.0760314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04987461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0991686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007461648220306706,"score_gpt":0.2425051828511417,"score_spread":0.235043534630835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}