{"id":"W2521535665","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4720","title":"An Epistemological Theory of Argumentation for Adversarial Legal Proceedings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Adversarial system; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006164011,0.0001145419,0.0001964498,0.00005130004,0.0001568216,0.00004505286,0.000167399,0.00009691523,0.0002920667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001223383,0.00006662351,0.0001082761,0.00001478971,0.000568226,0.0008422796,0.00002230597,0.00007494315,0.00002702416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001660012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003655078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001790128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000227013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991777,0.00002461126,0.0003284169,0.0001294691,0.0001232984,0.0002165317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992313,0.0001859804,0.000204389,0.00008804251,0.0002420845,0.00004818797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002950362,0.00005476061,0.0002056779,0.00005414059,0.00002185383,4.602759e-7,0.005360597,8.609918e-7,0.0008690059,0.988205,0.0002280269,0.004704626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003954377,0.004867494,0.002519834,0.00008835456,0.0001489768,0.00001616347,0.01367014,0.00007515316,0.008120281,0.6857832,0.2801372,0.0006188172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7553365,0.00003548741,0.004612002,0.0007522354,0.001652551,0.0007488074,0.0001580086,0.0001565292,0.2365479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948329,0.000005434359,0.0004415428,0.0005263513,0.0006796649,0.00003787087,0.00001874792,0.000007569211,0.003449951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3024218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3197926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06811105210042746,"score_gpt":0.2886414067462146,"score_spread":0.2205303546457872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}