{"id":"W2521791448","doi":"10.7202/1039128ar","title":"Boundary Dynamics in Natural Resource Management: The Ambiguity of Stakeholder Inclusion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue Gouvernance","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Stakeholder; Boundary (topology); Inclusion (mineral); Natural resource management; Domain (mathematical analysis); Management science; Natural resource; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental planning; Knowledge management; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Public relations; Geography; Economics; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003322445,0.0001003788,0.0001148494,0.00002193901,0.0005868751,0.00004926237,0.001068705,0.00003315547,0.0001872419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003105314,0.00007943803,0.00004384569,0.0001111649,0.0003430547,0.000241512,0.002642431,0.0001514409,0.0001025513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003209284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003387525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002124821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004925328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991291,0.00003103419,0.0001787232,0.0002058723,0.0002361903,0.0002191046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998916,0.0000166279,0.0002539264,0.0007877737,0.000002839631,0.00002281963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008849397,0.0001559711,0.7564243,0.0002213947,0.00002962628,0.0000909267,0.002094673,0.001373027,0.00008140774,0.02416427,0.04912493,0.166151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003067145,0.00001301698,0.7762046,0.00009730188,0.00000896319,0.000001305805,0.00003672537,0.005241572,0.00002610212,0.001581193,0.2163604,0.0001220388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7863787,0.000132244,0.000008215437,0.001618158,0.0001779026,0.0002409707,0.000008511505,0.00001183966,0.2114234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679977,0.0001571744,0.0001353389,0.0001413856,0.00003580861,0.0000113204,0.00000378278,0.000009344669,0.0315082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1816189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4513828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01410926270282655,"score_gpt":0.2332794816647468,"score_spread":0.2191702189619202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}