{"id":"W2521881585","doi":"10.1080/00393630.2016.1183104","title":"Autoethnography as a new approach in conservation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Conservation","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; York University; University of the Arts London","keywords":"Autoethnography; Reflexivity; Process (computing); Sociology; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Art; Psychology; Computer science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00560502,0.0001076118,0.0002216308,0.0003185369,0.000204692,0.00002667983,0.000200792,0.0001019946,0.00005846867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018087,0.00008721635,0.00004024008,0.001381837,0.0008452745,0.0004560131,0.00007580561,0.0001263989,0.00005055938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000375579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008252481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007835363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01264897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969885,0.001410946,0.000356664,0.0003057627,0.0005005879,0.0004375585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974296,0.001961984,0.0001001792,0.0001859371,0.0001951341,0.0001271372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001021781,0.0001125948,0.8245457,0.00003538582,0.00003954336,0.000008342258,0.04396962,0.000004141154,0.0009502494,0.08788733,0.01728094,0.02506392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003708773,0.0001808214,0.5650049,0.0006199551,0.00002292975,0.000001010405,0.05149277,0.000682771,0.0007430172,0.1731168,0.2037673,0.000658932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.939823,0.0005419644,0.002486757,0.03296115,0.0003345923,0.0007282788,0.000002125143,0.00009634118,0.02302581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853353,0.001045454,0.007782228,0.00213344,0.0001700736,0.0002895512,0.000002109163,0.00001566263,0.003226218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2595409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7979345954858458,"score_gpt":0.6675198492003301,"score_spread":0.1304147462855156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}