{"id":"W2521995278","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-16-0072.1","title":"The Development and Evaluation of a Statistical–Dynamical Tropical Cyclone Genesis Guidance Tool","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Weather and Forecasting","topic":"Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tropical cyclone; Probabilistic logic; Global Forecast System; Tropical cyclone forecast model; Climatology; Meteorology; Brier score; Environmental science; Numerical weather prediction; Probabilistic forecasting; Consensus forecast; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Geology; Geography; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003993528,0.00007782357,0.0001153226,0.00001742545,0.0001971473,0.00003244889,0.00007267471,0.00003795208,0.0001490408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003297928,0.00003563015,0.0000165378,0.00005546513,0.0002201126,0.00005522184,0.0000212935,0.00005238898,0.000006033684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005373063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002924359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000167903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001239195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988496,0.0001188482,0.000247528,0.0001770821,0.0003773151,0.0002296313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990515,0.0006865695,0.00003820124,0.00007605006,0.00006092353,0.00008682325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003784133,0.000003153674,0.439285,0.000007111701,0.000006819429,6.193799e-7,0.00004078478,0.000003988764,0.0001160411,0.0004706014,0.000005119662,0.560023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000350132,0.00006817861,0.9806098,0.00002141177,0.000009931373,0.000006430185,0.00003637998,0.01541806,0.00006130547,0.002582869,0.0007638311,0.00007169824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937882,0.0008646312,0.004381153,0.0003075695,0.00003045649,0.0001111306,0.00001896488,0.000007926071,0.0004898963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948806,0.00005183711,0.004968954,0.00001366852,0.0000450997,0.000003911102,0.000002861286,0.000002314833,0.00003072813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5599512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1631892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04636047832720316,"score_gpt":0.2680701209489511,"score_spread":0.2217096426217479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}