{"id":"W2523170793","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2017-0852","title":"Magnetic brane of cubic quasi-topological gravity in the presence of Maxwell and Born–Infeld electromagnetic field","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Black Holes and Theoretical Physics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Payame Noor University","keywords":"Physics; Electromagnetic field; Singularity; Curvature; Conic section; Magnetic field; Born–Infeld model; Metric (unit); Brane; Topology (electrical circuits); Classical mechanics; Quantum electrodynamics; Mathematical physics; Geometry; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004674815,0.0006945606,0.0007174364,0.001148279,0.001442477,0.001757967,0.0008623481,0.001686089,0.002142266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00130171,0.0003626101,0.0007545678,0.0004901523,0.002267649,0.00149353,0.00144489,0.001027699,0.0002220352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001302824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001215878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004404102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003584325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997575,0.00008421618,0.00001028814,0.00002445596,0.00004972192,0.00007388689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995744,0.00005553629,0.0001167079,0.00003477561,0.00006634399,0.0001522884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003713552,0.0001351513,0.001812681,0.0001767858,0.00008943201,0.001786475,0.0002972292,0.03492682,0.0129977,0.9431503,0.001686228,0.002569919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005091158,0.000327066,0.004993693,0.00005598792,0.00006851577,0.001765322,0.000912006,0.442975,0.002817336,0.5433195,0.002141462,0.0001149211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687273,0.0003304049,0.009939485,0.001489953,0.0001400774,0.00003207476,0.00007449678,0.00009132918,0.01917488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890206,0.0001641259,0.005380489,0.000150511,0.0001115723,0.00002574744,0.00008857468,0.00002607406,0.005032386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004404102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009452701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00676667445999255,"score_gpt":0.2197569969214815,"score_spread":0.212990322461489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}