{"id":"W2523495911","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.09.001","title":"An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship: Market logic, religious diversity, and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Venturing","topic":"Microfinance and Financial Inclusion","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Institutional logic; Social capital; Microfinance; Diversity (politics); Resource (disambiguation); Context (archaeology); Entrepreneurship; Economics; Business; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Computer science; Finance; Economic growth; Sociology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004001443,0.0001368081,0.00030395,0.0002191813,0.0007313607,0.00004948428,0.000281214,0.0001206035,0.00003467326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105943,0.0001239268,0.00005272132,0.0004319554,0.00007559326,0.0004920162,0.0004103711,0.0001041286,0.00001458453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001608912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002687178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002832426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.531084e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989321,0.00002086644,0.000486827,0.000271602,0.00007842659,0.0002102097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990417,0.00001868458,0.0005214466,0.0001293922,0.0002089676,0.00007978477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001151485,0.002540813,0.7199342,0.0003171754,0.0001611801,0.0001547193,0.008606474,0.001295914,0.05246475,0.1069656,0.08758844,0.01881929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002618971,0.0002438023,0.8710196,0.0002832049,0.0000414524,0.0003033411,0.0001348455,0.00007199911,0.002549255,0.02630926,0.09561199,0.000812265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8597445,0.00200357,0.1350394,0.001491633,0.0002919592,0.0001092196,0.0001178377,0.00001489775,0.001187032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968325,0.001119465,0.00115934,0.0003642678,0.0003312278,0.000001512678,0.000009364492,0.00001412283,0.0001681419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1510855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.562511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01904473913428309,"score_gpt":0.2007385934381116,"score_spread":0.1816938543038285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}