{"id":"W2523734706","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.207","title":"L’étude d’évaluabilité : utilité et pertinence pour l’évaluation de programme","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.340102,0.001699716,0.001656815,0.01229318,0.002504163,0.01681311,0.002697347,0.002827713,0.004769814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5485969,0.0009439245,0.002459351,0.009608186,0.00698431,0.01051795,0.005484201,0.004168797,0.0005159146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01203749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0114739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008412727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00769343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5580021,0.3496925,0.01738132,0.005644001,0.06735093,0.001929168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2502321,0.6509695,0.02222799,0.0191719,0.0555921,0.001806373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008650234,0.0007773155,0.05166221,0.00795872,0.001459976,0.0002719583,0.04183193,0.01000426,0.002616168,0.1059709,0.00364091,0.7729406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008180488,0.005415685,0.2943694,0.03505176,0.002915676,0.00254223,0.03876358,0.1400487,0.025666,0.2682886,0.1849725,0.00114772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.348743,0.02789103,0.4442705,0.01991553,0.0009526458,0.003836915,0.0007357002,0.0007123551,0.1529424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8780047,0.002867364,0.1131549,0.000488712,0.0002260987,0.002501788,0.0001886996,0.0001547535,0.002412905],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.659898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8137717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.427739724308826,"score_gpt":0.52477615985024,"score_spread":0.097036435541414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}