{"id":"W2524313288","doi":"10.21700/ijcis.2016.109","title":"Textual Entailment for Arabic Language based on Lexical and Semantic Matching","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computing and Information Sciences","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural language processing; Arabic; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Textual entailment; Logical consequence; Matching (statistics); Linguistics; Mathematics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001344666,0.0006752441,0.0008842128,0.003326647,0.001451884,0.002167226,0.001137393,0.001020817,0.01048103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007557885,0.0003540286,0.001670217,0.002168485,0.000590254,0.004454601,0.001614068,0.001048986,0.003069631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000731774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00181122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003737158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00356764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975396,0.0006926799,0.0003436973,0.0006054998,0.0006274873,0.0001910388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691,0.00145,0.0002342154,0.0003616629,0.0009512966,0.00009279982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002268855,0.0007609849,0.006138583,0.00197215,0.0003674726,0.00190884,0.001645969,0.01824382,0.0629648,0.1000505,0.03145485,0.7722232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002281317,0.0003622124,0.00641224,0.0002275359,0.0006805384,0.001698271,0.001728734,0.7562686,0.05832651,0.1459327,0.02795694,0.0001775536],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1436027,0.001633595,0.8312115,0.001434759,0.0003571436,0.0006311241,0.005251422,0.004208279,0.01166956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6156958,0.00078403,0.3646902,0.0002088924,0.0003257586,0.0003420055,0.01127713,0.0004332991,0.006242879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01048103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03506255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0169735477574902,"score_gpt":0.3074368635685489,"score_spread":0.2904633158110587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}