{"id":"W2524644309","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.02.024","title":"Outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy following laser in situ keratomileusis: a cohort study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Corneal surgery and disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement; Credit Valley Hospital; Trillium Health Centre; University Health Network; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Photorefractive keratectomy; Medicine; Keratomileusis; LASIK; Ophthalmology; Keratometer; Refractive error; Visual acuity; Coma (optics); Retrospective cohort study; Refractive surgery; Surgery; Cornea; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009847915,0.0005654538,0.0008253759,0.001066807,0.001363911,0.001652879,0.001093072,0.001320342,0.002240987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00338745,0.0008448219,0.001910076,0.002051967,0.0007070205,0.001908664,0.001173179,0.001754356,0.0004091969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009620347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001142969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01931525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01870439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986632,0.000175333,0.0001802402,0.0004114413,0.0001895482,0.0003802503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969445,0.0003255722,0.001289415,0.0004080038,0.0003896103,0.0006429232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002244525,0.00009756679,0.9984521,0.000007614827,0.0001821005,0.0002112318,0.000160334,0.00001587433,0.0001553977,0.00002344063,0.0000854893,0.0003844349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001800944,0.0002212983,0.9977932,0.000009370515,0.0001054612,0.0005700305,0.0009716897,0.0000894021,0.00003408217,0.00003654092,0.0001352393,0.0000156041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992942,0.0001605305,0.00005458593,0.00003485975,0.000009350163,0.000008963923,0.0002524813,0.000001664949,0.00018346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992585,0.0001209502,0.00003730994,0.00002924274,0.00001303806,0.00001054095,0.0003696568,0.000003080789,0.0001578168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01931525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03840566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01881322763657766,"score_gpt":0.2882488765821498,"score_spread":0.2694356489455721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}