{"id":"W2524729976","doi":"10.1108/srj-06-2015-0072","title":"Does the theory of stakeholder identity and salience lead to corporate social responsibility? The case of environmental justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Responsibility Journal","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Stakeholder; Legitimacy; Salience (neuroscience); Environmental justice; Harm; Corporate social responsibility; Sociology; Stakeholder theory; Value (mathematics); Situational ethics; Originality; Public relations; Business; Political science; Psychology; Law; Qualitative research; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02113327,0.0003414002,0.0005911413,0.0002349717,0.00220596,0.0003130147,0.0006987497,0.0001853874,0.0002312687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01478403,0.000160161,0.0003534197,0.0009218178,0.002581277,0.001487756,0.0006554734,0.0005427194,0.00001721746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002653102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004392502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001693472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001082229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948575,0.001464124,0.001533084,0.0005996362,0.0009647801,0.0005808678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932602,0.002905029,0.00255936,0.0006224724,0.0005917327,0.00006120624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02205397,0.0009286591,0.1639337,0.0005663491,0.0003860432,0.0009627664,0.0186129,0.000006760743,0.2943736,0.1216081,0.0007911323,0.375776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001193783,0.0000965601,0.5851262,0.00008712094,0.0005529889,0.0002631169,0.03807285,0.00001902915,0.001694698,0.3713276,0.001081787,0.0004842458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907483,0.00006696467,0.0009951381,0.006525382,0.0005460227,0.000733521,0.00008242612,0.00003237936,0.0002698973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977375,0.00001291297,0.00008125161,0.0005704888,0.001050349,0.00001225187,9.424854e-7,0.00003525301,0.0004990427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4211924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07662753467396999,"score_gpt":0.3003980202095025,"score_spread":0.2237704855355325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}