{"id":"W2524812397","doi":"10.1109/tsp.2016.2614487","title":"Sequential Likelihood Ratio Test for Cognitive Radios","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing","topic":"Cognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Detector; Cognitive radio; Robustness (evolution); Covariance matrix; Likelihood-ratio test; Detection theory; Computer science; Algorithm; Gaussian; Covariance; Gaussian noise; Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging); Speech recognition; Statistics; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Wireless; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002214882,0.0002245768,0.0002085614,0.0001655015,0.0006041888,0.000278468,0.0002332182,0.00008609776,0.00003444192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001420222,0.0001731,0.000152008,0.0003677122,0.00009139589,0.0008519942,0.000002085555,0.000157692,0.00003013852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000988054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000215854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002986428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001469319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983981,0.00004934962,0.0002788392,0.0005425487,0.0002643207,0.0004668132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854,0.0007976348,0.0001088498,0.0001444849,0.0002709845,0.0001380302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006095331,0.0001396536,0.000005176001,0.00001801389,0.00002974253,0.00001091448,0.000226111,0.0001671958,0.03269142,0.0001101689,0.00004213523,0.9664985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003965211,0.0009627956,0.00006298444,0.001165256,0.0001363153,0.0001606435,0.0001168033,0.3829492,0.6051297,0.004072237,0.0003979882,0.0008808658],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002008102,0.00008399528,0.995806,0.0008069565,0.0002748834,0.0003593839,0.00003317403,0.0002440493,0.0003834868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991952,0.00001540425,0.007132681,0.0003397785,0.0002720619,0.00005105826,0.000001012732,0.0000275005,0.0002085103],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7058815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0208822429058192,"score_gpt":0.2591753491070149,"score_spread":0.2382931062011957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}