{"id":"W2525897226","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v9n5p70","title":"Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Assessing Sustainable Development among Underprivileged Communities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiti Malaysia Terengganu","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Sustainability; Sustainable development; General partnership; Consistency (knowledge bases); Government (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Environmental economics; Business; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Mathematics; Political science; Operations research; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01047703,0.000838225,0.001188398,0.006402871,0.001820497,0.002741085,0.001373687,0.0007915862,0.001450261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01563621,0.0004135112,0.001298025,0.005384631,0.001135514,0.001900637,0.002927769,0.001363298,0.0001315042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002336015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006590412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008676765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009908658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9866545,0.008850227,0.0005399412,0.000420716,0.003155082,0.0003793811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933867,0.004337325,0.0005857155,0.0001501963,0.001360038,0.0001800634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002460908,0.0006467454,0.01835277,0.002597778,0.0006950692,0.0008808353,0.008218572,0.4169175,0.006527127,0.08946493,0.003344624,0.452108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005981264,0.0003677526,0.003665485,0.0003005551,0.0001350012,0.00009409552,0.004437359,0.9165786,0.002066455,0.06798739,0.004214498,0.00009301338],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07754866,0.0008517972,0.9104947,0.0009801943,0.00009075305,0.001702355,0.0001792584,0.0002138851,0.007938344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4531185,0.0007645655,0.5444684,0.00006098139,0.00002561058,0.0009737251,0.0001295649,0.00001546754,0.0004432249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01047703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05540854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0151893181047523,"score_gpt":0.2636512836187165,"score_spread":0.2484619655139642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}