{"id":"W2526382848","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2015.07.530","title":"A METHOD TO IDENTIFY ZIG-ZAG CONDUCTION IN SINUS RHYTHM: A NEW TOOL FOR VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA ABLATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Ablation; Sinus rhythm; Ventricular tachycardia; Cardiology; Reentry; Nerve conduction velocity; Rhythm; Internal medicine; Thermal conduction; Tachycardia; Radiofrequency ablation; Atrial fibrillation; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006614994,0.000619324,0.000417999,0.001950661,0.0003469837,0.001174927,0.0004851214,0.0009744852,0.004287974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00293255,0.0003049079,0.0003990466,0.0007827813,0.0004249059,0.001129638,0.000866193,0.0009143479,0.001800034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001218819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000377762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004074513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007332325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996105,0.00008076276,0.00003334814,0.00009149289,0.0001514858,0.00003246095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985585,0.0006695348,0.0001404409,0.0001894334,0.0003120532,0.0001301594],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008410668,0.0001272998,0.007271336,0.0003325881,0.00009023617,0.0006939787,0.0002459334,0.00203395,0.2110429,0.00306521,0.004877477,0.7693779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008043548,0.002575537,0.06642716,0.0007669053,0.0009476946,0.05188279,0.00100665,0.4726681,0.285404,0.02471256,0.09204631,0.0007580392],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.03024706,0.001109668,0.9625586,0.0002906719,0.0003296717,0.000150732,0.0003094101,0.002183277,0.00282103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1821645,0.0009567087,0.8111376,0.0002618513,0.0002158291,0.0001854493,0.0002607335,0.0004390514,0.004378267],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004287974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01434475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03170741480655844,"score_gpt":0.3262222896103428,"score_spread":0.2945148748037844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}