{"id":"W2527480274","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2016.09.011","title":"An elementary integrality proof of Rothblum’s stable matching formulation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research Letters","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rounding; Elementary proof; Mathematical proof; Mathematics; Bipartite graph; Combinatorics; Hull; Combinatorial proof; Convex hull; Matching (statistics); Discrete mathematics; Regular polygon; Computer science; Graph","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002947774,0.0009174214,0.001335414,0.001558374,0.001872065,0.003086672,0.002993556,0.002591659,0.02025569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01036661,0.0007248448,0.001830138,0.002025359,0.003351298,0.007169601,0.003553109,0.005328537,0.002331263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002359651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001544539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001006798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009171015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986908,0.0004060163,0.00006045638,0.0002893196,0.0003195724,0.0002338704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969951,0.001714008,0.0001988347,0.0003151294,0.0005621939,0.0002147727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007331372,0.00001226606,0.00003230554,0.00001731554,0.000004341077,0.00001631615,0.00005195503,0.0005943126,0.0001825886,0.9959089,0.001187028,0.001985528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007277518,0.00000506127,0.00004032559,0.000006933775,0.000004944979,0.00001686231,0.00001498894,0.005107385,0.0001200049,0.9931234,0.001548638,0.00000427448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04753029,0.001084905,0.7389945,0.008608253,0.00061774,0.000149643,0.0004420658,0.0002576887,0.2023149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8448241,0.001185645,0.1008923,0.002305839,0.0008390464,0.00033904,0.0003254824,0.000300025,0.04898858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02025569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06776202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08850971007240122,"score_gpt":0.3358788426814007,"score_spread":0.2473691326089995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}