{"id":"W2527652806","doi":"","title":"Faculty-librarian relationships in the information literacy context: A content analysis of librarians' expressed attitudes and experiences","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of information science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005308588,0.0001890069,0.0005603477,0.004684347,0.003988575,0.005809939,0.0007712789,0.0008056866,0.003900182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0218129,0.0002911795,0.0003721008,0.006078522,0.003624533,0.005237398,0.005365092,0.001016489,0.0004775194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004321277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003398895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004784186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008123522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945229,0.003389442,0.000387392,0.0003115203,0.0007631611,0.0006255354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779649,0.01708691,0.0020313,0.0005426165,0.001559764,0.0008145327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004842422,0.00005642445,0.02816553,0.0002012499,0.00001055572,0.0002379043,0.9522125,0.00003070663,0.0007617676,0.001283612,0.0004513881,0.01653994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004485481,0.00004172077,0.03423437,0.0001304027,0.00001006573,0.0001233581,0.9582394,0.00007967732,0.0003933377,0.00035063,0.006377463,0.00001499909],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912952,0.0002870449,0.0007034857,0.0005750646,0.00001278558,0.00008599168,0.0001029019,0.00001361602,0.006923933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958732,0.0004968601,0.0007039201,0.0003000149,0.00002268315,0.0002064627,0.00009812566,0.0000208015,0.002277905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.99419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03135324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08127113647031584,"score_gpt":0.2954200087277021,"score_spread":0.2141488722573863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}