{"id":"W2528159938","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2016.09.020","title":"Use of phylogenetical analysis to predict susceptibility of pathogenic Candida spp. to antifungal drugs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Microbiological Methods","topic":"Antifungal resistance and susceptibility","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Hôtel-Dieu de Québec; Université Laval","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Nasivvik Centre for Inuit Health and Changing Environments","keywords":"Phylogenetic tree; Biology; Antifungal drug; Antifungal; Microbiology; Drug resistance; Echinocandins; Fungus; Pathogenic fungus; Fungicide; Phylogenetics; Genetics; Gene; Fluconazole; Caspofungin; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001069791,0.0005815609,0.0003896198,0.002261167,0.0004338473,0.0008005812,0.0002963716,0.0004650778,0.0008899485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004065613,0.0001701834,0.0003451532,0.001131906,0.0002001405,0.000349059,0.0003400195,0.0004804401,0.000395512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001558836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000312228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00182412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002108773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991509,0.0003892155,0.00008252058,0.0001323557,0.0001756801,0.00006928125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974999,0.001362536,0.0004127788,0.0001080165,0.0004448156,0.0001719542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001277536,0.0006144944,0.8040859,0.0001566882,0.0002743805,0.0002828959,0.0002347973,0.002851774,0.119898,0.0002119057,0.0004256186,0.06968603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007452462,0.002050122,0.8520856,0.0001332409,0.0006031957,0.003682227,0.0008952157,0.08436252,0.05209869,0.0007969278,0.003153867,0.00006392528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898083,0.0007781171,0.006511468,0.0001414367,0.00002258698,0.00004594759,0.0007370203,0.00004944424,0.001905733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901789,0.0002782714,0.008656432,0.00003478179,0.00001092571,0.00001544102,0.0006349293,0.000007325702,0.0001828387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002261167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005657613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05338977031873024,"score_gpt":0.3706300952963459,"score_spread":0.3172403249776157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}