{"id":"W2528159938","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2016.09.020","title":"Use of phylogenetical analysis to predict susceptibility of pathogenic Candida spp. to antifungal drugs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Microbiological Methods","topic":"Antifungal resistance and susceptibility","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Hôtel-Dieu de Québec; Université Laval","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Nasivvik Centre for Inuit Health and Changing Environments","keywords":"Phylogenetic tree; Biology; Antifungal drug; Antifungal; Microbiology; Drug resistance; Echinocandins; Fungus; Pathogenic fungus; Fungicide; Phylogenetics; Genetics; Gene; Fluconazole; Caspofungin; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004144347,0.0002449339,0.001646636,0.0003715712,0.00003290311,0.00000830621,0.0003034034,0.0002632887,0.0006394371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00588961,0.0001273338,0.00106495,0.0009791714,0.0003573505,0.00006158368,0.0001547891,0.0002657951,0.000007621234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001354088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001969395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000215701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002927013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960959,0.001160972,0.001586409,0.0004369812,0.0003232291,0.0003965321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957843,0.00158561,0.0005468374,0.000606988,0.0009626179,0.0005136742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002061163,0.0003000811,0.3221479,0.0000313608,0.0004830131,0.00001534292,0.00005489908,0.000009926015,0.659813,0.000009882229,0.000301377,0.01477198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005856566,0.002389933,0.6703017,0.0001267637,0.0008704237,0.00003238697,0.0000629253,0.000004034165,0.3243734,0.00007176375,0.001057866,0.0001230916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9163777,0.0002540241,0.08217758,0.0005368866,0.0001264525,0.0003108968,0.0001728463,0.000008066914,0.00003556651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7800939,0.00009895685,0.2193571,0.0002100142,0.00008069543,0.000001537024,0.000002213989,0.000009215578,0.0001463775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3481538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7050839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05338977031873024,"score_gpt":0.3706300952963459,"score_spread":0.3172403249776157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}