{"id":"W2528428273","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2015.07.540","title":"PREDICTORS AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF INPATIENT VERSUS AMBULATORY MANAGEMENT AFTER AN INDEX EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISIT FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A POPULATION BASED STUDY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Heart Failure Treatment and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Emergency department; Atrial fibrillation; Odds ratio; Confidence interval; Ambulatory; Emergency medicine; Retrospective cohort study; Population; Heart failure; Propensity score matching; Cohort; Logistic regression; Internal medicine; Pediatrics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000852719,0.0004998713,0.0008182902,0.0009391722,0.001233335,0.001674581,0.0008041974,0.00170105,0.00188316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004080484,0.0007761894,0.001404857,0.001850513,0.0008030173,0.001523624,0.001014696,0.002255501,0.0003332111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007158103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007302605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01118703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01579111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987308,0.0003182067,0.0001352172,0.0003155058,0.0001980178,0.0003022525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970549,0.0005931038,0.001102745,0.0001976508,0.0002447008,0.0008068411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002111702,0.0001580003,0.9989466,0.00000394534,0.00007947261,0.00008320221,0.000103221,0.00001530732,0.00005968418,0.00001119768,0.00005641615,0.000271776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001520918,0.0002127428,0.9988692,0.000003325508,0.00004024043,0.0001858267,0.0004845468,0.0001110447,0.000009844033,0.00002259427,0.00003765494,0.00000784142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994241,0.00007846094,0.00003352571,0.00004206225,0.000009357072,0.000008356652,0.0001582375,0.000001443744,0.0002443784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993749,0.00006879208,0.00004012756,0.00005301882,0.00002762931,0.00001179079,0.0003053179,0.00000236611,0.0001160348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01118703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0222438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05147036408788978,"score_gpt":0.3362916808069285,"score_spread":0.2848213167190387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}