{"id":"W2528508044","doi":"10.1016/j.csndt.2016.09.002","title":"High resolution pore size analysis in metallic powders by X-ray tomography","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation","topic":"Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes","field":"Engineering","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Porosity; Metallography; Materials science; Gas pycnometer; Raw material; Tomography; Volume (thermodynamics); Resolution (logic); Metal powder; Mineralogy; Metallurgy; Composite material; Metal; Computer science; Microstructure; Optics; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004313228,0.0002369315,0.0002272972,0.0008676523,0.0001693189,0.0005252433,0.0003822808,0.0004449662,0.0013601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008149251,0.0002347541,0.0001709425,0.0004538911,0.000463916,0.0005942845,0.0003210418,0.0002924318,0.0002577598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000181155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001168297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005414692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006633713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997278,0.00003118112,0.00001752027,0.00006322942,0.0001346559,0.00002561672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994604,0.0002589862,0.00008694432,0.00006918333,0.0001074138,0.00001703865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008259621,0.00001376546,0.001472191,0.00008780079,0.000004658924,0.0001113848,0.0001116543,0.0009869176,0.9899257,0.000378557,0.00005258307,0.006772185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001246353,0.000206516,0.02125348,0.00002292322,0.00002264485,0.001088291,0.0001886966,0.02225845,0.9527743,0.000370117,0.00178069,0.00002144471],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8337387,0.001580016,0.1593093,0.0001051115,0.00002085291,0.000103324,0.0005078607,0.0007592909,0.003875533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422858,0.0006378643,0.05543321,0.00002364075,0.000008405672,0.00004331148,0.0002379981,0.00006598861,0.001263674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004549921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04097271468133135,"score_gpt":0.2956015083887942,"score_spread":0.2546287937074629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}