{"id":"W2528515238","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.39.2.279","title":"Reciprocity Revisited: Give and Take in Dutch and Immigrant Families","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social exchange theory; Ethnic group; Kinship; Collectivism; Norm of reciprocity; Social psychology; Immigration; Strong reciprocity; Sociology; Individualism; Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Social science; Microeconomics; Social capital; Game theory; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007232791,0.000126574,0.0004855481,0.0001640339,0.0005057183,0.00003310675,0.00009432245,0.00004297516,0.000001927288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001859249,0.0001006813,0.00005992637,0.0002152468,0.0005834197,0.0002709382,0.00005406525,0.0002010554,8.954327e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001008388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009699441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002858056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002001002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986988,0.0002276068,0.0004200027,0.0001342293,0.0003465122,0.0001729027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986823,0.0003561738,0.0002464373,0.00004556591,0.0006047105,0.0000648154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002594574,0.0001429772,0.2931778,0.00006088705,0.0005595167,0.000178069,0.6428398,0.0002189698,0.001954828,0.04674545,0.01252861,0.001333587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000738412,0.0002713636,0.6291822,0.0002956027,0.00003367854,0.00003639557,0.3522146,0.0002319607,0.00004138313,0.003524028,0.01317874,0.0002516408],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724058,0.0221049,0.00005549949,0.0005426505,0.0002172478,0.0001049129,0.000005123497,0.000004704591,0.004559183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639251,0.03488323,0.0005396816,0.0002214109,0.0001688195,0.000003364841,4.283962e-7,0.000003787438,0.0002541636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3360043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4105662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08167099852840526,"score_gpt":0.3634508522698147,"score_spread":0.2817798537414095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}