{"id":"W2528636278","doi":"10.1109/cdc.2016.7799208","title":"Distributed Nash equilibrium seeking by gossip in games on graphs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Best response; Gossip; Mathematical optimization; Correlated equilibrium; Computer science; Graph; Convergence (economics); Strategy; Distributed algorithm; Potential game; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Repeated game; Distributed computing; Equilibrium selection; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002010489,0.001005768,0.0009891957,0.000750012,0.0008190548,0.001133377,0.001146441,0.00120504,0.001242776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007729293,0.000388102,0.0006885579,0.0006279178,0.002079816,0.001678954,0.001557185,0.0009056411,0.0001844756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001201292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009931031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002976099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002392073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989748,0.0005938348,0.00003591647,0.0001288471,0.0001637368,0.0001028434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960522,0.003083209,0.0003322834,0.0001432759,0.0002139174,0.0001751076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009069301,0.00003392925,0.0004221929,0.00007986734,0.00004603406,0.0001393644,0.0001633015,0.8865772,0.001861556,0.1040595,0.0004912097,0.006035141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001884474,0.00002646542,0.00004591571,0.000004771926,0.00000590716,0.00001673195,0.00002978256,0.9486768,0.0002865712,0.05065994,0.0002216115,0.000006697259],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07278723,0.0001809686,0.9203911,0.0004647876,0.00003296271,0.00009641125,0.00003685528,0.0001385869,0.005871147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8985339,0.000231913,0.09819854,0.0001114921,0.000036773,0.00021471,0.00003735386,0.00004362888,0.00259165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002976099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01063263,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.027554866392173,"score_gpt":0.3036831090373875,"score_spread":0.2761282426452145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}