{"id":"W2528831442","doi":"10.1505/146554816820127569","title":"Bundling forest ecosystem services for FSC certification: an analysis of stakeholder adaptability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Forestry Review","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers; WWF International; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Adaptability; Certification; Stakeholder; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Forest ecology; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Biology; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005295461,0.0001057822,0.0002121227,0.0000331694,0.00005890526,0.00002194864,0.0008099615,0.00002367388,0.00276564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005169652,0.00005694559,0.0001727901,0.0002660038,0.00006762039,0.0002760135,0.0001237716,0.00002905351,0.0001791685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007481665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000738498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002177942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001488772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988921,0.00004574526,0.0003941469,0.0002355253,0.0003059248,0.0001265388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991046,0.0001258694,0.0002539543,0.0004262709,0.00003618617,0.00005309295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001523496,0.0002772355,0.8769333,0.002520185,0.001468618,0.000001185345,0.0003172403,0.005750997,0.0008301198,0.05036784,0.01049481,0.05088615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004482921,0.0001215906,0.2621239,0.001180374,0.001552506,0.000002478615,0.00004310957,0.06172716,0.0001771348,0.003561054,0.6686989,0.0003635183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.970861,0.001289352,0.001784613,0.0174941,0.000236424,0.001312612,0.0003253521,0.00005420754,0.006642288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970717,0.001123524,0.0002152118,0.0006222806,0.00007815809,0.00008676604,0.00007240313,0.000008786279,0.0007211845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6582041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07176734128506397,"score_gpt":0.3062227018105692,"score_spread":0.2344553605255052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}