{"id":"W2528910556","doi":"10.1109/async.2016.12","title":"Finding Glitches Using Formal Methods","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Glitch; Computer science; Formal verification; Formal equivalence checking; Boolean satisfiability problem; Satisfiability; Statement (logic); Domain (mathematical analysis); Combinational logic; Logic simulation; Property (philosophy); Computer engineering; Algorithm; Formal methods; Electronic circuit; Theoretical computer science; Logic gate; Programming language; Mathematics; Detector; Electrical engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006289845,0.001458726,0.0007150021,0.003106974,0.001212501,0.00342146,0.002807629,0.00122087,0.008842372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0172535,0.0008841458,0.002655176,0.001054173,0.004485337,0.004892718,0.002611177,0.002111332,0.001624343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001437673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003015033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002338392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002900641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99497,0.001774427,0.0004662049,0.0006495051,0.001808739,0.0003310168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838935,0.01180619,0.0008770805,0.001912183,0.001369237,0.0001418614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009854348,0.0002045172,0.002096648,0.001451395,0.0001456045,0.00072345,0.001227767,0.09035856,0.01193207,0.6840063,0.004958985,0.2027962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001489938,0.000131146,0.0002930423,0.0006679535,0.000118995,0.0006755381,0.000457644,0.3324462,0.02143433,0.5948091,0.04872811,0.00008888156],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001911588,0.00009880705,0.9948833,0.0001561112,0.00001860712,0.00009823354,0.00007768193,0.0009650718,0.001790678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05647674,0.0004400722,0.9402629,0.0001555809,0.00003669369,0.0002893687,0.0003404891,0.0003279132,0.00167022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008842372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03326422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1116056976063649,"score_gpt":0.3668368360392211,"score_spread":0.2552311384328562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}