{"id":"W2528986567","doi":"10.1103/physrevx.7.011021","title":"Systematic Magnus-Based Approach for Suppressing Leakage and Nonadiabatic Errors in Quantum Dynamics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review X","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; University of Chicago","keywords":"Leakage (economics); Quantum; Quantum dynamics; Quantum system; Quantum sensor; Dynamics (music); Quantum state; State (computer science)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003053184,0.0003070974,0.0003919386,0.0003700642,0.0005444815,0.0004258554,0.0007812883,0.0003868635,0.002162549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004790622,0.0002051931,0.0002217656,0.0003255053,0.0008480982,0.0009296364,0.001080384,0.0006167723,0.0003687849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003412958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004971002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002270772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004918023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998492,0.00002820397,0.000006437906,0.00003517323,0.00005752205,0.00002339222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998441,0.00004301784,0.000030397,0.00003961395,0.00002834172,0.00001446143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000420784,0.0001398096,0.0007723133,0.0007390966,0.00009148856,0.0002543982,0.0003213525,0.01382878,0.5140484,0.3391408,0.00343286,0.1268099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001951881,0.001054824,0.001951126,0.0001457467,0.0002108237,0.001016052,0.0001278056,0.2974835,0.5001162,0.1437299,0.05380653,0.0001623916],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2247131,0.01412771,0.7156423,0.002247127,0.0008575794,0.0001850979,0.0001873189,0.001661596,0.04037804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9180574,0.002511747,0.07350989,0.0003440337,0.0001237661,0.00008321647,0.00005123772,0.0001168536,0.00520191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002162549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007234454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0223659045442851,"score_gpt":0.3066402300207324,"score_spread":0.2842743254764473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}