{"id":"W2529087497","doi":"10.1037/cap0000074","title":"Reporting practices and use of quantitative methods in Canadian journal articles in psychology.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Null hypothesis; Psychology; Statistical hypothesis testing; Variance (accounting); Statistical significance; Transparency (behavior); Test (biology); Statistics; Applied psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.149284,0.0004915167,0.003168609,0.005373999,0.0002134875,0.0004348543,0.001905882,0.0004940971,0.003430916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3555276,0.0002847401,0.0005005,0.003486431,0.0007849744,0.0008545113,0.00004296866,0.0006947606,0.0001797892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004952208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001702609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6134761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9696055,0.01201422,0.01370789,0.001991662,0.0006866011,0.001994135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621187,0.007883574,0.02194059,0.00390269,0.00117648,0.002977988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002713681,0.00002820081,0.8208893,0.000007227266,0.00008406631,0.0007992724,0.001080728,0.000006001089,0.001154174,0.001847954,0.0244529,0.1496231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006554034,0.0001577939,0.8257357,0.0001062286,0.0000390331,0.0006666456,0.0009681297,0.0000774712,0.00001447277,0.02222846,0.1490251,0.0003255951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636129,0.001922011,0.002220856,0.02390907,0.001381652,0.0006352371,0.00008283152,0.000005013945,0.006230392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507312,0.0002365159,0.04441766,0.003700129,0.00004679753,0.00004263145,0.000002795123,0.00003316961,0.0007891153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3830445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9109096626666788,"score_gpt":0.6647422055466112,"score_spread":0.2461674571200676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}