{"id":"W2529130738","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3038","title":"Compact is Back: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Revival of the Compact Theory of Confederation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001092927,0.00007478773,0.0002168811,0.00001004286,0.001027363,0.0000183054,0.0003200447,0.0000327706,0.0005556201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001746077,0.0000332389,0.0001227766,0.00005191864,0.00127029,0.00009476871,0.00002414698,0.0001033109,0.000001822636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009705156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001153749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7525708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9360302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984154,0.0003791731,0.0003306865,0.00006332247,0.0006381535,0.0001733361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987252,0.0003551512,0.0003849499,0.0001090759,0.0003687361,0.00005683202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003506037,0.00002531305,0.005097636,0.000004185845,0.00008403593,4.484884e-7,0.0008128382,0.000009546091,0.001092222,0.9856992,0.00689799,0.000241562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001463688,0.0001651576,0.09521253,0.001106637,0.0002188799,0.00003796587,0.01085751,0.00001014424,0.02131074,0.7643049,0.1049728,0.0003391106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02057742,0.0005430735,0.0001627163,0.03651984,0.0004701296,0.0001670375,0.00007955734,0.000003137331,0.9414771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990413,0.0001543861,0.000007212285,0.000263393,0.0001618571,2.101935e-7,1.805762e-7,0.000002809822,0.0003686819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7901747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03738853155582945,"score_gpt":0.2722559116898031,"score_spread":0.2348673801339736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}